Washington Court Upholds Anti-Harassment Order
A couple's neighbour blocked driveway, cut water. Court intervenes.
'%3E%3Crect%20width%3D'96'%20height%3D'96'%20fill%3D'%23B3261E'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'30'%20cy%3D'24'%20r%3D'44'%20fill%3D'%23fff'%20opacity%3D'.12'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'60'%20cy%3D'74'%20r%3D'40'%20fill%3D'%23000'%20opacity%3D'.10'%2F%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3Cg%20fill%3D'%23fff'%3E%3Crect%20x%3D'29'%20y%3D'49'%20width%3D'8'%20height%3D'19'%20rx%3D'1'%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D'39'%20y%3D'40'%20width%3D'9'%20height%3D'28'%20rx%3D'1'%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D'50'%20y%3D'45'%20width%3D'8'%20height%3D'23'%20rx%3D'1'%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D'60'%20y%3D'53'%20width%3D'7'%20height%3D'15'%20rx%3D'1'%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D'41'%20y%3D'34'%20width%3D'5'%20height%3D'6'%2F%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
A Washington couple claimed their neighbour blocked their shared driveway and cut off their water supply. The couple sought legal protection, and the Washington Court of Appeals confirmed their claims warranted an anti-harassment order.
The dispute between the couple and their neighbour escalated into serious harassment concerning driveway access and utilities. The neighbour's actions led the couple to seek court intervention.
The Washington Court of Appeals upheld the anti-harassment order on October 27, protecting the couple from further harassment.
Frequently asked questions
What did the neighbour do to harass the couple?
The neighbour blocked the shared driveway and cut off the couple's water supply.
What action did the court take?
The Washington Court of Appeals upheld an anti-harassment order protecting the couple.
Join the conversation
Comments are reviewed by the news desk before appearing here. Please stay respectful and keep private information out of your post.
Loading reader comments…